It does seem like they missed this part of the article doesn't it?
FTA-"The findings of the study don't call into question model projections for other parts of the globe, Monaghan said. "The models are really doing quite a good job at simulating the 20th century changes over the six inhabited continents," he told LiveScience".
FTA: "This is showing us that, over the past century, most of Antarctica has not undergone the fairly dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe," Monaghan said.
again: dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe
so, looks like your own article says global warming is real. you should really read this stuff first before you throw it out there and disprove your own points.
Ohh my, more flawed computer models exposed as junk "science."
Can they take back half of the Nobel Peace Prize?
Maybe you two should actually read the article before commenting. It does nothing to dispel the global warming theory.
It does seem like they missed this part of the article doesn't it?
FTA-"The findings of the study don't call into question model projections for other parts of the globe, Monaghan said. "The models are really doing quite a good job at simulating the 20th century changes over the six inhabited continents," he told LiveScience".
They only read the headline.
FTA: "This is showing us that, over the past century, most of Antarctica has not undergone the fairly dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe," Monaghan said.
again: dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe
so, looks like your own article says global warming is real. you should really read this stuff first before you throw it out there and disprove your own points.